Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning: The Three Parts
Every argument has three ingredients: a claim (what you're arguing), evidence (proof), and reasoning (why the evidence supports the claim). Miss any one of these, and your argument falls apart.
The CER Framework
Claim
A clear statement of what you believe to be true. Good claims are specific and falsifiable — meaning someone could potentially prove them wrong.
- Weak claim: "Sugar is bad." (Vague — bad how? For whom? In what amounts?)
- Strong claim: "Consuming more than 50g of added sugar per day increases the risk of type 2 diabetes in adults." (Specific, measurable, testable.)
Evidence
Data, facts, observations, or expert testimony that supports the claim. Good evidence is:
- Relevant — actually connected to the claim
- Reliable — from a trustworthy source
- Sufficient — enough to support the claim (one example isn't enough for a universal claim)
Reasoning
The explanation of WHY the evidence supports the claim. This is the bridge that most people leave out.
Bad: "Sugar is bad. A study found people who eat lots of sugar get diabetes." (Where's the reasoning?)
Good: "Consuming more than 50g of added sugar per day increases diabetes risk. A 2015 meta-analysis of 38 studies (Imamura et al., BMJ) found that each daily serving of sugary drinks increased diabetes risk by 13%. This is because excess sugar causes insulin resistance over time, which is the primary mechanism of type 2 diabetes."
The Hierarchy of Evidence
Not all evidence is equal:
- Strongest: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (combining many studies)
- Randomised controlled trials
- Observational studies
- Expert opinion
- Case studies and anecdotes
- Weakest: "My friend said..." / "I read somewhere..."
When someone supports a claim with "I know someone who..." they're at the bottom of the evidence pyramid. When they cite a meta-analysis, they're at the top.
Tonight's Question
"Pick any claim someone made today — at school, on TV, online. What evidence did they give? Was there reasoning connecting the evidence to the claim?"
CER Practice
- Each person picks a claim they want to argue (e.g., "School holidays should be longer").
- Find real evidence to support it (spend 10 minutes researching).
- Write out the full CER: Claim + Evidence + Reasoning.
- Present to the family. Others evaluate: is the evidence reliable? Is the reasoning solid?
- Rate each argument 1-10. Discuss what made the strong ones strong.
Go Further
- Research: What is a "meta-analysis" and why is it considered the strongest form of evidence?
- Practice: Read a news article and identify the CER structure. Is anything missing?
- Book: How to Read a Paper by Trisha Greenhalgh (2019) — understanding medical evidence.
- Question: When experts disagree, how do you decide who to believe? (Hint: follow the evidence, not the person.)
What We Simplified
- The evidence hierarchy isn't absolute. A well-designed observational study can be more valuable than a poorly designed randomised trial.
- Real arguments are iterative. You don't build one perfect argument — you refine your claims as new evidence emerges.
- CER works best in science. In ethics, philosophy, and politics, evidence looks different (moral arguments, precedents, values).
Sources
- Imamura, F. et al. (2015). "Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes." BMJ, 351, h3576.
- Greenhalgh, T. (2019). How to Read a Paper. 6th ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Sackett, D.L. et al. (1996). "Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't." BMJ, 312, 71-72.
Want to track progress and save lessons?
Create a free family account. No credit card, no catch — just a place to keep track of what your family is learning.
Create Free Account